Redesigning the Live user experience.
BrowserStack is a popular browser testing service that allows users to interactively test websites on thousands of real desktop and mobile devices. By installing virtual machines, OSes and browsers on hundreds of remote machines, BrowerStack solved the biggest challenges to getting started with virtual machines - complicated setup procedures, high cost of buying OS licenses, maintaining device hardware and difficulty managing memory on the users machine. For large companies, maintaining device labs to test across real devices became very expensive, very fast due to the high costs of device procurement, transportation, warehousing and maintenance.
Opportunities
Once a BrowserStack testing session started however, the user experience lacked the speed and simplicity that virtual machines provided. We spoke to users and studied feedback by volume of requests over a 3 month period in order to shortlist the primary problems we needed to solve.
opportunity | tickets | emotion | optimize |
---|---|---|---|
Remote browsers were sometimes unusable due to slow network connections. | 350 | speed | |
Testing local files was tedious to setup. Lack of HTTPS made it insecure. | 195 | security | |
Users were hesitant to use Java and Flash, particularly over a non-secure connection. | 156 | security | |
Common user workflows such as keyboard shortcuts, copying and pasting did not work. | 133 | user experience | |
Difficult to find help when needed. | 69 | user experience | |
Responsive testing with mobile emulators sometimes generated incorrect results. | 44 | user experience | |
No support for streaming media. | 38 | technology | |
Pricing too high for infrequent usage. | 15 | pricing |
Goals and Research
We wanted to build a browser testing experience that matched that of a local virtual machine, but also took it up a notch. To do this we would have to move away from Flash and Java to Canvas and WebRTC, design a more intuitive interface and support established user workflows from the old interface.
BrowserStack vs. Virtual Machines
BrowserStack needed to be at least as good as a local virtual machine in order to increase user sign ups. We studied similarities and differences between virtual machines and BrowserStack and learned that we could improve:
Rendering speed
As a cloud based, real-time browser testing service, a slow testing experience has always been the biggest challenge to overcome. It would often take 4-6 seconds to get the results from the remote browser for a single page scroll. The delay was a result of many things - network latency, connection speeds, page sizes, browser and OS quirks, Flash as a technology, and the distance between the user and the location of the remote browser. In order to improve usability, we needed to get session loading times down to 2-3 seconds with a page rendering time of at most 1.5 seconds.
Usability and User Experience
We wanted to ease users into the experience of using a browser within a browser, and make them as comfortable using BrowserStack as they were using a locally installed virtual machine or better yet, holding a mobile device in their hands.
Device availability
By offering over 1000 desktop and mobile browsers, BrowserStack attracted most users by their high availability of browsers. However, loading and displaying the remote browsers often took too long. We had to refine the steps involved with loading a remote browser and developed fallbacks for when the remote browser did not open in fullscreen.
Learning from other cloud-based services
Like Dropbox and Google Drive, BrowserStack also took traditional desktop software and moved it to the cloud. We studied the onboarding experiences of Dropbox and Google Drive to learn about how they modelled their interfaces around traditional desktop software and leveraged the cloud to provide additional features on top. Users felt more familiar with the product and hence required little to no onboarding.
Both, Google Drive and Dropbox added features to address problems of traditional software. Google Drive offered richer formatting options, embeddable content, collaboration tools and the ability to share documents and resume work seamlessly. Dropbox made files available to you whenever and wherever you needed them and subsequently improved security, availability and accessibility.
Similarly, BrowserStack extended the capabilities of traditional virtual machines by moving them to cloud based machines, giving them virtually unlimited storage and processing power. As a result, users now had thousands of browsers and devices available in a matter of seconds.
Solutions
rendering speedLoad pages faster with WebRTC and Canvas.
Our analytics told us that 52% users came from Chrome and 24% from Firefox. Consequently, these were also the 2 major browsers that were experimenting with WebRTC at the time. Hence, we decided to abandon Flash and Java for users coming from Chrome and Firefox, moving them to the faster and more stable WebRTC. Average session loading times reduced to 3.5 seconds on desktops and 4-5 seconds on mobile devices. There was a huge boost to page rendering times and users now only experienced a minor delay between 0.8ms to a second while scrolling and interacting with the browser. Safari, Internet Explorer and Opera users would continue to use Flash.
Canvas allowed us to stream media from the remote browsers using HTML5 video. This streaming capability meant users could now test for audio/video support and quality, quality at different connection speeds and debug immersive websites that used rich media content and CSS3 animations.
Going full screen by default
In the old interface, users only tested in a portion of the screen. As a result, users had to scroll horizontally and vertically within the remote browser if they were testing a large screen resolution.
Going fullscreen made the product experience feel richer and more immersive; a true browser within a browser experience. We initially considered opening a new session in a new tab or a pop up window, but quickly settled on filling the user's screen with the remote browser.
Moving all actions into a single toolbar
All actions and information about the remote browser was moved into the new dragable toolbar. The toolbar changes based on whether the user is testing desktop or mobile devices. We also added keyboard support for regular users.
Test local files and servers with no setup
We built custom Chrome and Firefox extensions that created a secure connection between the user's computer and BrowserStack’s remote browsers. We moved the installation of the extension into the onboarding experience, to explain what it did and how it worked. If users opted-out, they could enable the extension at a later time from the toolbar.
Quick Launch
Most active users usually tested on a common set of 10 desktop and mobile devices. Freelance designers and developers would test fewer while enterprises would test more. However, there was often a 50-60% overlap in the browsers all users tested. We also found that many users were unaware which browsers to test on.
I created a screen which would allow users to launch their frequently tested browser-OS combinations, through the web UI or a browser extension. Quick Launch is a set of popular, customizable browser-OS combinations ready to test on with a single click. For teams using BrowserStack, individual Quick Launch setups could be shared between team members.
Tabular list of browsers
Scalability of the list of browsers was a huge challenge in the old interface. The UI was generated through bulky JavaScript and and the UI lacked aesthetic. To make things worse, the product team did not want to make any immediate changes to the listing and wanted to show all versions of all browsers and devices.
The new interface was a single column for each browser. Limiting each browser to the latest 10 versions decluttered the lists making it easier for users to find their browser. Older versions were available on demand.
Matching wallpapers to their OS
Wallpapers help us identify an OS. After matching the default OS wallpapers with the selected OS in the browser listing window, I noticed that the background OS wallpaper of the browser listing gave a perceived speed improvement in the overall experience. I quickly prototyped the idea and had it validated with a user group. 70% of the users felt a sense of continuity in the testing experience as the matching wallpapers of the browser list and the remote OS merged. They felt the overall experience was faster.
Responsive testing out of the box
By default all desktop browsers open in Responsive mode. When the user resizes his browser, the remote browser is also resized and switches to the responsive layout if available. This allows users to test real time responsiveness of their websites. This feature made the Responsive product redundant.
Results
In March 2015, users were given an option to switch to the new design and three months later, in May 2015, the new interface was enabled for all users. By the second week of June 2015, traffic from Chrome and Firefox increased to 63% and 30% respectively, with the remaining browsers making up approximately 7%. Three months after launching, user registrations almost doubled and sales of freelance, team and enterprise plans increased by 80%, 120% and 200% respectively. Some enterprise clients who signed up after launching the redesigned Live product included BBC, The Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), Microsoft and Twitter.
Customer reactions
.@browserstack great interface rework, it's clean, clear, quick. Super nice.
— Murray Bunton (@murraybunton) May 24, 2015
Wow the new BrowserStack is niceeeeee.
— Joe Casabona (@jcasabona) May 28, 2015
Wooooooah the new @browserstack looks good! Feels faster, too. A+
— vince falconi (@vincefalconi) May 27, 2015
Just took @browserstack's new version, "Live", for a test drive. Holy crap, this is awesome. The future it is now.
— Wesley Workman (@workmanw) May 28, 2015
The new @browserstack is bad ass, especially the mobile devices :D
— David van Leeuwen (@davidvanleeuwen) May 21, 2015
Wow. @browserstack really did some amazing improvements on their side. It feels so fluent; smooth and fast!
— Kees Romkes (@KeesRomkes) May 27, 2015
After 10min of "live" trial tests, clearly: Browserstack > Saucelabs.
— Erwann Mest (@_kud) May 26, 2015
gotta say, the new browserstack is pretty cool
— [inaudível] (@Dr_Gustavo) June 1, 2015
Love the update to live testing on @browserstack. Well done!
— Derek Long (@iamdereklong) May 21, 2015
Wow, @browserstack's new Live product just blew my mind. Amazing product execution to make something once frustrating feel so simple.
— Jonathan Kim (@hijonathan) June 4, 2015
👏👏👏
Learnings
Onboarding is as important as the product.
With the redesign, features had been added and removed and the user journey had fundamentally changed. We needed to tell our users about the improvements and how to access them to get the most out of their testing experience.
However, to launch the product in time, we did not invest enough time in the onboarding. And while all users, new and old, found the system more stable and much simpler to use, they were still not aware of all the features available and how to optimize their browser testing workflow. For example, many users were unaware that they could test upload and download functionality on their website. They did not know where to find the files.
Design relatable experiences.
By modeling the new user experience around that of a virtual machine, we were able to design an experience that users felt familiar with, even though many of them were first time users. Since users could port over their knowledge of using VMs, they found it easier to use BrowserStack without having to change their existing workflows of testing.
Learn about your audience and design targeted experiences.
In order to move from Flash and Java to Canvas and WebRTC, we needed to ensure that all users would be able to use the new technologies. Traffic data told us that close to 85% of our traffic came from Chrome and Firefox, the two main browsers that supported WebRTC. This gave us the confidence to make the switch and redesign a whole new experience from scratch.
For the remaining 15% of users, we simply updated the UI and the workflow of the old UI/UX, leaving the technology stack the same. A number of the new features were unavailable to these users. We encouraged users of Safari, IE and Opera to make the switch to Chrome and Firefox, and after 3 months, BrowserStack's traffic from Chrome and Firefox rose to 93%.
By studying our analytics, we were able to design two separate experiences for users coming to the same page. This helped us adopt newer technologies, build a better product and offer more features to users.
Case studies
-
zealth ai
UX Design for reporting and managing cancer symptoms.
-
hdfc bank
Redesigning HDFC Bank’s consumer banking app.
-
sauce labs
Designing a unified, web and app testing UX.
-
browserstack
Redesigning the Live user experience.
-
browserstack
Rebranding and building a design system.
-
jawe
A website builder for everybody.